Difficult, Inevitable, and Necessary
Church ministry is full of difficult conversations. Understanding that these conversations need to be had, and how people may respond, is key to a good resolution.
Henry Cloud, in his book Necessary Endings1, points out that difficult conversations - where someone is challenged about their beliefs, choices, or actions - are inevitable because so are endings in this life. As we age, sooner or later we have to face up to the changes that will bring.
Within a family, that may mean hard conversations about what support is needed, whether a move to a different setting is needed, and then the conversation we may have to have about end of life and going home to heaven.
In a work environment, the company will change. It may mean promotion for some but not for others, or even layoffs and redundancy. These are difficult conversations to have. Problems arise, and accusations may be made by insiders or external sources about all manner of things that need addressing.
Church isnât immune. All leaders are âinterim pastorsâ and even a happy âsuccessionâ will mean all kinds of changes and conversations needing to be had. Alas, often things arenât that happy and âleavingsâ can be some of the most problematic times, for members or leaders.
Some of these necessary endings can be conducted much better than they would otherwise be if we knew how to have difficult conversations. We need to grow in grace, in character, and in skill so that we have good difficult conversations.
Reactions to a challenge
Henry Cloud points out that though all of us sin, not all respond to a difficult conversation in the same way.2
Itâs best to know the typical responses to sin being uncovered or human will being challenged. As Sartre tartly remarked: âHell is other peopleâ (i.e. Hell is when someone else challenges my self-autonomy, cutting across my will).
Wise (Proverbs 9:8-9)
First, he describes the person who responds to feedback well.
No one finds it easy to hear feedback when something negative is highlighted or even something good could be made better. But there is a category of âwiseâ where someone responds well to it and wants to engage.
They may say that it wasnât easy to hear that, but they also recognise it may not have been easy to say it either. They want to change and recognise that the Lord may be using you to help them become more like Christ. All well and good. And oh, that all difficult conversations were with wise people.
Foolish (Proverbs 9:8)
But there is another kind â he calls them âfoolishâ - who though they listen, one senses that they are not listening to understand and change.
Cloud describes some of the tactics employed by a foolish person: they may deny the problem; they may deflect criticism onto something or someone else; they may distract into a different topic; they may (vehemently) defend by going on the attack (at you). There are several other tactics that can be employed, often several at once.
I have often asked audiences what is the next word that we speak after the word âsorryâ? Itâs always the word âbutâ! Then follows either a series of excuses or a counterattack along the lines of âbut youâŠ.â. That is the fool at work in all of us.
The fool does listen to something, however: consequences. Once you have identified that the person is responding in this way, the difficult conversation may have to turn to consequences if change is not seen. Consequences such as âWe want a timesheet filled inâ; âWe will have to initiate a disciplinary procedureâ; âWe will have to terminate your employmentâ; âYou/we will have to leaveâ kinds of consequences.
Few of us like being that straight. If you are a (reasonably) wise person, it is usual to think that others are reasonable too. To realise that some people, Christians amongst them, just donât tick like that is a salutary awakening.
If you are not in leadership, you will be able to avoid such people. But leaders will have to confront lest the foolish person brings havoc in their wake. And to confront will mean having to bring consequences to the fore.
Not only is that hard, but especially so today when it feels like a particularly direct power play and the person can (so easily) express their victimhood. It goes against the grain of a normally âniceâ leader to be like this, so it might just not happen.
But Christ didnât place you into leadership to just be nice. You are appointed to provide and protect the flock, and that from the foolish person as well as the downright evil.
âEvilâ (Titus 3:10,11)
The third category of reaction he describes is the one where there is a definite sense of wrong/evil/destruction. He, somewhat colourfully, says these are the people you confront with âguns, lawyers and moneyâ! Whatever you might make of that phrase, he is trying to point out that such evil canât be dilly-dallied with.
There are roaring lions, angels of light, and harm doers, such as Alexander the metalworker (2 Timothy 4:14-15) whom Satan uses to stop or ruin the Lordâs work. Some such wear the uniform of âChristianâ but they may be falsely masquerading (1 Timothy 6:3-6). Sometimes they may be real believers but are so gripped by sin as to backslide and be the vehicle of wrong, not right (Matthew 16:25).
Perhaps Paul had all this in mind when he counselled Titus to âwarn a divisive person once, then twiceâ, but once they had âshown their spotsâ he said, âhaving nothing to do with them. You may be sure that such a man is warped and sinful; he is self-condemned.â (Titus 3:10-11)
Such conversations are difficult, but they have to be had.
Called to have difficult conversations
The final reason we will explore for why such conversations must be had is that that is what our calling entails.
Elders are like âdadsâ to the family of God. Not âFatherâ, but nevertheless caring, loving, guiding, instructing, providing, and so forth like a dad would. You can see this in the lives of leaders in action in the Bible. Paul describes himself using this kind of mum/dad language as he reassures the young church at Thessalonica that he really loves and cares for them (see 1 Thessalonians 2:7-12).
Here are just three examples of that in practice.
Notice how direct the conversations were. They are in different cultural settings from each other, and from us, but they underscore that the most humble, loving leaders needed to have difficult conversations.
- Moses (Exodus 16:1-8; 17:1-4; 18:13-27; Exodus 32; Numbers 12, 14, 16; Deuteronomy 31-34). Itâs amazing how Moses survived the enormous stress he was under for decade after decade. Time after time he had to lovingly confront even his own nearest and dearest, and even when people let him, and especially the Lord, down so much.
- Paul (Acts 20:17-38). This is an astonishing conversation all round. Not only does Paul set a really high bar for what authentic ministry looks like (and feels like â see v19), but he doesnât beat around the bush as he directly challenges these leaders (Acts 20:28-31). That must have been quite something. Yet what is amazing is the response of Acts 20:36-38 â more tears. But they werenât tears of relief that he was, at last, leaving them after such a scorching, but because they loved him dearly and knew his difficult words were for their utmost good and came from a heart of sincere love and humility.
- Titus (Titus 1:10-16). As Paul explains to Titus why elders must be appointed (Titus 1:5), it becomes clear quite quickly that their role isnât just to give themselves to âthe positiveâ but they have to deal with âthe negativeâ and that is so that damage might be limited and true health return to the families of God on Crete (Titus 1:10-15). The tone is urgent, serious, and demanding. The situation demands action and conviction; it isnât a âconsider it in your own timeâ pleasantry.
I for one would love some help here. Many good things have been written about power, and its abuse. I hope to have learnt from them. But few have addressed the problems associated with these kinds of difficulties.
One leader in a little booklet most helpfully discussed what you do with âMr and Mrs Dragonâ. But many others donât face up to the reality that when Christians sin, dealing with that sin will feel quite a difficult for anyone sensitive to the charge of âpower abuseâ. And some shrill voices will cry that at the least provocation.
This is part two of three in a series on difficult conversations. Also see Why Difficult Conversations Are Getting More Difficult (part 1) and How to Have Difficult Conversations (part 3)